Skip to main content
Skip to main content

ASSIST

What Works logo
Evidence rating: 3+
Cost rating: 1

ASSIST (named for its trial: A Stop Smoking in Schools Trial), is a schools-based smoking prevention programme. It is a universal programme for children between the ages of 12 and 13. It is delivered in secondary schools, and aims to improve resilience and reduce the take-up of smoking.

The programme involves using a questionnaire to identify influential students within schools, and then recruiting them into the programme and delivering interactive skills and information training. These influential peer supporters then disseminate information positively and effectively to empower their friendship groups not to take up smoking. 

EIF Programme Assessment

Evidence rating: 3+
Level 3 indicates evidence of efficacy. This means the programme can be described as evidence-based: it has evidence from at least one rigorously conducted RCT or QED demonstrating a statistically significant positive impact on at least one child outcome. This programme does not receive a rating of 4 as it has not yet replicated its results in another rigorously conducted study, where at least one study indicates long-term impacts, and at least one uses measures independent of study participants.
Cost rating: 1
A rating of 1 indicates that a programme has a low cost to set up and deliver, compared with other interventions reviewed by EIF. This is equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than €125. This figure is based on an analysis of UK costs and a conversion rate of 1.19.

What does the plus mean?

The plus rating indicates that this programme has evidence from at least one level 3 study, along with evidence from other studies rated 2 or better.

Child outcomes

This programme can affect outcomes for children in Active and healthy, physical and mental wellbeing.

According to the best available evidence for this programme's impact, it can achieve the following positive outcomes for children:

Preventing substance abuse

Reduced prevalence of smoking in the past week

based on study 1

  • Statement: 2.64-percentage point reduction in proportion of participants smoking in the last week (self-report)
  • Score: 6
  • Timeframe: A year later
  • Long term: 1

This programme also has evidence of supporting positive outcomes for couples, parents or families that may be relevant to a commissioning decision. Please see About the evidence for more detail.

Who is it for?

The best available evidence for this programme relates to the following age-groups:

Preadolescents

How is it delivered?

The best available evidence for this programme relates to implementation through these delivery models:

  • Group

Where is it delivered?

The best available evidence for this programme relates to its implementation in these settings:

  • Secondary school

How is it targeted?

The best available evidence for this programme relates to its implementation as:

  • Universal

Where has it been implemented?

  • England
  • France
  • Scotland
  • Wales
  • Ireland

Ireland provision

This programme has been implemented in Ireland.

Ireland evaluation

This programme’s best evidence does not include evaluation conducted in Ireland.

About the programme

What happens during the delivery?

How is it delivered?

  • ASSIST is delivered in six sessions of varying length – one 20-minute session, three hour-long sessions, and two full-school-day sessions. These are delivered to groups of peer supporters by external trainers.

What happens during the intervention?

  • The programme involves four distinct phases:
    1. Students are nominated by their peers using a questionnaire completed by the whole year group.
    2. The most nominated 18%, balanced by gender, are then recruited to join the programme as peer supporters.
    3. These peer supporters will then participate in two days of training away from school where they will be given the skills and information that they need to perform their role. The training is very interactive and student-led. There is much emphasis on influence and persuasion – being empathetic, non-judgmental and understanding about the reasons why people smoke, as well as the benefits of making healthier choices. Students are encouraged to record their conversations in a diary which they bring to each of the follow-ups. These school-based sessions give students and trainers an opportunity to share progress and support each other while also refreshing skills and information.
    4. At the end of the programme the students are presented with a certificate, as is the school, which is left with a high-quality group of young health ambassadors.


What are the implementation requirements?

Who can deliver it?

  • This programme is delivered by a lead trainer with NFQ-6 level qualifications, and two trainers also with NFQ-6 level qualifications.


What are the training requirements?

  • Practitioners have 21 hours of programme training each. Booster training of practitioners is not required.

How are the practitioners supervised?

Practitioner supervision is provided through the following processes: 

  • It is recommended that practitioners are supervised by one host agency supervisor (qualified to NFQ-7/8 level). 
  • It is recommended that practitioners are also supervised by one programme developer supervisor (qualified to NFQ-7/8 level).


What are the systems for maintaining fidelity?

Programme fidelity is maintained through the following processes:

  • Training manual
  • Other printed material
  • Other online material
  • Face-to-face training
  • Fidelity monitoring.

Is there a licensing requirement?

There is a licence required to run this programme.



How does it work? (Theory of Change)

How does it work?

  • Smoking-related behavioural change in adolescents is propagated by trained peer supporters who promote the benefits of remaining smoke-free and the risks of smoking.
  • The programme teaches influential peer supporters’ ways of disseminating information positively and effectively, alongside conflict resolution methods, to empower their friendship groups not to take up smoking.
  • In the short term, peer supporters learn about the risks of smoking and the benefits of being smoke-free, and are trained to disseminate these messages in an ad-hoc way by looking for opportunities to include smoking facts in their everyday conversations with their friends.
  • In the long term, peer supporters develop leadership and communication skills and build personal resilience, and are more confident and less likely to take up smoking.

Intended outcomes

  • Active and healthy, physical and mental wellbeing


Contact details

Sally Good
sally.good@evidencetoimpact.com

www.evidencetoimpact.com


About the evidence

ASSIST’s most rigorous evidence comes from a cluster RCT which was conducted in the UK.

This study identified statistically significant positive impact on a number of child outcomes.

This programme is underpinned by one study with a level 3 rating, hence the programme receives a level 3 rating overall.

Study 1

Citation:Campbell et al., 2008
Design:Cluster RCT
Country:United Kingdom
Sample:10,730 children recruited from 59 schools, with low number of smokers at baseline.
Timing:Post-test; 1-year follow-up; 2-year follow-up
Child outcomes:
  • Reduced prevalence of smoking in the past week
Other outcomes:
    Study rating:3

    Campbell, R., Starkey, F., Holliday, J., Audrey, S., Bloor, M., Parry-Langdon, N., ... & Moore, L. (2008). An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): a cluster randomised trial. The Lancet371(9624), 1595-1602.

    Available at
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673608606923

    Study design and sample

    The first study is a rigorously conducted RCT. 

    This study involved random stratified-blocked assignment (stratified by country; type of school; size of school; level of entitlement to free school meals) of schools to an ASSIST group or to a control group which continued their usual smoking education.  

    This study was conducted in the UK, with a sample of 10,730 children recruited from 59 schools in the west of England and southeast of Wales. The sample was relatively diverse in terms of family affluence. Only a small proportion (6%) of children were smokers at baseline.

    Measures

    Smoking prevalence was measured using a questionnaire asking children to report on whether they had smoked in the past week (self-report).

    Findings

    This study identified statistically significant positive impact on a child outcome, which was reduced prevalence of smoking in the past week (at 1-year follow-up).